Comments on: George and Darren, 2 http://martyholman.com/2010/07/george-and-darren-2/ Inspired by a true story Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:08:55 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: George and Darren: the Finale | Martyholman.com http://martyholman.com/2010/07/george-and-darren-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13247 George and Darren: the Finale | Martyholman.com Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:46:56 +0000 http://martyholman.com/?p=2433#comment-13247 [...] 1part 2part 3 – with [...] [...] 1part 2part 3 – with [...]

]]> By: George and Darren (and Jeff) | Martyholman.com http://martyholman.com/2010/07/george-and-darren-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13190 George and Darren (and Jeff) | Martyholman.com Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:27:59 +0000 http://martyholman.com/?p=2433#comment-13190 [...] Round three took place on a quiet Monday afternoon, as George worked at his computer in St. Louis and Darren nodded off at his workplace in Philly.  But just when things were starting to quiet down, my friend Jeff asked to read the conversation, and believing the conversation to be a part of an ‘all-in’ facebook thread, he intervened, and brought new life to the conversation.  You can read parts 1 and 2 here and here. [...] [...] Round three took place on a quiet Monday afternoon, as George worked at his computer in St. Louis and Darren nodded off at his workplace in Philly.  But just when things were starting to quiet down, my friend Jeff asked to read the conversation, and believing the conversation to be a part of an ‘all-in’ facebook thread, he intervened, and brought new life to the conversation.  You can read parts 1 and 2 here and here. [...]

]]> By: Jack http://martyholman.com/2010/07/george-and-darren-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13163 Jack Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:55:17 +0000 http://martyholman.com/?p=2433#comment-13163 1. Rightfully destroyed the rule book George? Big assumption on your part although I guess I am assuming what that rule book was. 2. Darren your arguement of many people wandering around in the woods, or mountain for that matter fails the law of non contradiction. 2+2=4 can't also equal 72. If you are saying everybodies God exists than you by default are admitting a God exists. Now we just need to narrow your choices down. 1. Rightfully destroyed the rule book George? Big assumption on your part although I guess I am assuming what that rule book was.

2. Darren your arguement of many people wandering around in the woods, or mountain for that matter fails the law of non contradiction. 2+2=4 can't also equal 72. If you are saying everybodies God exists than you by default are admitting a God exists. Now we just need to narrow your choices down.

]]> By: Mark http://martyholman.com/2010/07/george-and-darren-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13140 Mark Tue, 27 Jul 2010 13:30:38 +0000 http://martyholman.com/?p=2433#comment-13140 I am reading Mere Christianity right now and a lot of these arguments follow similar lines of thought to those explored by CS Lewis. Very interesting. Keep it coming! I am reading Mere Christianity right now and a lot of these arguments follow similar lines of thought to those explored by CS Lewis. Very interesting. Keep it coming!

]]>