<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ways to improve&#8230;my blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/</link>
	<description>Inspired by a true story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 21:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Holman</title>
		<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martyholman.com/?p=333#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Thanks for keeping me on my toes UR.
Eric, thanks so much for the advice.  I&#039;ll be trying to catch up on some cssing in the near future.  Probably be a good thing to know, and yes, you are a visioneer.  Keep it up man!  And continue to feel free to give me a heads up on whats happening in the future so I can keep up a bit too.
Jane, hmmm, what to say.  I can&#039;t really tell you what UR said, though I can tell you he&#039;s a colorful guy (probably a bit of an underexaggeration [sp?])
And I&#039;m not so sure that its so cut and dry as the way you proposed motive and such.  So because I want to have a clean home and maybe be better organized at my work or because I want to improve my messages each Sunday (I&#039;m a pastor), then I don&#039;t have to change a thing?  Not sure I follow the logic.  We should always be willing to improve, right?
The score thing is simply a tool to help me improve the blog. Improving isn&#039;t bad, in fact, I think I could make a case that not improving is bad for one&#039;s self, one&#039;s circumstances, and one&#039;s God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keeping me on my toes UR.<br />
Eric, thanks so much for the advice.  I&#8217;ll be trying to catch up on some cssing in the near future.  Probably be a good thing to know, and yes, you are a visioneer.  Keep it up man!  And continue to feel free to give me a heads up on whats happening in the future so I can keep up a bit too.<br />
Jane, hmmm, what to say.  I can&#8217;t really tell you what UR said, though I can tell you he&#8217;s a colorful guy (probably a bit of an underexaggeration [sp?])<br />
And I&#8217;m not so sure that its so cut and dry as the way you proposed motive and such.  So because I want to have a clean home and maybe be better organized at my work or because I want to improve my messages each Sunday (I&#8217;m a pastor), then I don&#8217;t have to change a thing?  Not sure I follow the logic.  We should always be willing to improve, right?<br />
The score thing is simply a tool to help me improve the blog. Improving isn&#8217;t bad, in fact, I think I could make a case that not improving is bad for one&#8217;s self, one&#8217;s circumstances, and one&#8217;s God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane</title>
		<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 22:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martyholman.com/?p=333#comment-816</guid>
		<description>Now I totally want to know what UR said that you deleted...
and I want to say this: why are you blogging? If you are blogging for YOU, for your church, for God, then what does it matter what &quot;score&quot; you got on a webreview?  If you are blogging about yourself, your church, and God for ATTENTION, then yeah, you could change up a thing or two... you know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I totally want to know what UR said that you deleted&#8230;<br />
and I want to say this: why are you blogging? If you are blogging for YOU, for your church, for God, then what does it matter what &#8220;score&#8221; you got on a webreview?  If you are blogging about yourself, your church, and God for ATTENTION, then yeah, you could change up a thing or two&#8230; you know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uneasy Rider</title>
		<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Uneasy Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martyholman.com/?p=333#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Glad to see you&#039;re reading the comments, Marty.  Every once in a while I&#039;ll toss you a bone like that to keep you on your toes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see you&#8217;re reading the comments, Marty.  Every once in a while I&#8217;ll toss you a bone like that to keep you on your toes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mill</title>
		<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-813</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martyholman.com/?p=333#comment-813</guid>
		<description>So, I don&#039;t think that websitegrader SEO stuff is that important, and Wordpress is doing the basics for you already.  The only real improvements I&#039;d suggest for your blog are some design ones, and that&#039;s subjective.  But if you wanted to, I could suggest a few things.

Hey, I&#039;m now a &quot;visioneer&quot;!  Thanks Marty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, I don&#8217;t think that websitegrader SEO stuff is that important, and WordPress is doing the basics for you already.  The only real improvements I&#8217;d suggest for your blog are some design ones, and that&#8217;s subjective.  But if you wanted to, I could suggest a few things.</p>
<p>Hey, I&#8217;m now a &#8220;visioneer&#8221;!  Thanks Marty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Mill</title>
		<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Mill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martyholman.com/?p=333#comment-812</guid>
		<description>The most important thing I can say here is that that site, websitegrader, it&#039;s aimed at evaluating how well your site will be as a marketing tool.  It&#039;s SEO for moneymaking sites, not for personal blogs.

Your links are red until they&#039;ve been visited, then they become black.  You&#039;re probably more used to seeing blue links turn purple, but your theme styles this as red-&gt;black.  You can change this if you want, but you&#039;ll have to learn how to read a little CSS, and go to Wordpress&#039;s theme editor to do it.  If you don&#039;t know CSS, I definitely recommend at least learning how to read it well enough to know what style to look for and change.  It should look like &quot;a:visited {color: black;}&quot; or &quot;a:visited {color: #000;}&quot;, and you want to change that color value from &quot;#000&quot; or &quot;black&quot; to whatever color value is given for most of your links (which you can find as like &quot;a {color: #883322;}&quot;).  

If that was just totally confusing, check out a tutorial here:
http://htmlhelp.com/reference/css/quick-tutorial.html

And a reference here:
http://xhtml.com/en/css/reference/

I&#039;ll post another comment with a less technical response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most important thing I can say here is that that site, websitegrader, it&#8217;s aimed at evaluating how well your site will be as a marketing tool.  It&#8217;s SEO for moneymaking sites, not for personal blogs.</p>
<p>Your links are red until they&#8217;ve been visited, then they become black.  You&#8217;re probably more used to seeing blue links turn purple, but your theme styles this as red-&gt;black.  You can change this if you want, but you&#8217;ll have to learn how to read a little CSS, and go to WordPress&#8217;s theme editor to do it.  If you don&#8217;t know CSS, I definitely recommend at least learning how to read it well enough to know what style to look for and change.  It should look like &#8220;a:visited {color: black;}&#8221; or &#8220;a:visited {color: #000;}&#8221;, and you want to change that color value from &#8220;#000&#8243; or &#8220;black&#8221; to whatever color value is given for most of your links (which you can find as like &#8220;a {color: #883322;}&#8221;).  </p>
<p>If that was just totally confusing, check out a tutorial here:<br />
<a href="http://htmlhelp.com/reference/css/quick-tutorial.html" rel="nofollow">http://htmlhelp.com/reference/css/quick-tutorial.html</a></p>
<p>And a reference here:<br />
<a href="http://xhtml.com/en/css/reference/" rel="nofollow">http://xhtml.com/en/css/reference/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll post another comment with a less technical response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Holman</title>
		<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martyholman.com/?p=333#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the thoughts UR.  I did edit a bit two parts for two different reasons.  I appreciate your suggestions though and your kind words about the blog.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the thoughts UR.  I did edit a bit two parts for two different reasons.  I appreciate your suggestions though and your kind words about the blog.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uneasy Rider</title>
		<link>http://martyholman.com/2008/06/ways-to-improvemy-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Uneasy Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://martyholman.com/?p=333#comment-809</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m more of a substance-over-form type of a guy, Marty, so I&#039;m primarily concerned with content.  And thusfar I think you have had a great mix of content... not just strictly church-related stuff, which can get stuffy after a while.  But you&#039;ve had some really interesting topics for discussion... you need to give a kick in the butt to your churchgoers to participate more.  This thing is INTERACTIVE.  That means people get to INTERACT with you and with each other.  To me, that&#039;s a huge attraction to the whole blog format.  And you&#039;re attentive to your blog...  you don&#039;t just throw something out there and let it ride for 3 weeks, ignore the people who comment, and then post something else a few weeks later.  (A BIT OF EDITING here)

(A BIT MORE EDITING)  But somehow I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll be seeing that here, so I personally would be cautious about making major changes.  Not that it cannot be improved, but to me the content and the interesting discussions are a tremendous attraction, and in that regard, I would be careful about making any big changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m more of a substance-over-form type of a guy, Marty, so I&#8217;m primarily concerned with content.  And thusfar I think you have had a great mix of content&#8230; not just strictly church-related stuff, which can get stuffy after a while.  But you&#8217;ve had some really interesting topics for discussion&#8230; you need to give a kick in the butt to your churchgoers to participate more.  This thing is INTERACTIVE.  That means people get to INTERACT with you and with each other.  To me, that&#8217;s a huge attraction to the whole blog format.  And you&#8217;re attentive to your blog&#8230;  you don&#8217;t just throw something out there and let it ride for 3 weeks, ignore the people who comment, and then post something else a few weeks later.  (A BIT OF EDITING here)</p>
<p>(A BIT MORE EDITING)  But somehow I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll be seeing that here, so I personally would be cautious about making major changes.  Not that it cannot be improved, but to me the content and the interesting discussions are a tremendous attraction, and in that regard, I would be careful about making any big changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

